Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Hold Steady/Art Brut/1990's @ 9:30 Club [11/20/07]

So The Hold Steady, Art Brut and The 1990's hit DC tonight as part of the NME Rock N Roll Riot Tour. It should have been called the Are You Tired of Our Shtick Yet? tour.

If you're not familiar with them, let's do a quick recap:

The Hold Steady: A talented band with a frontman (Craig Finn) whose "lyrics" are intelligent, funny, and sometimes even moving. However, I use quotation marks around lyrics because they're not so much lyrics as merely dialogue. Finn doesn't sing so much as rhythmically talk over the band's songs. While their music is good (and can be great at times), I admit that the shtick is starting to wear thin for me.

[Sidenote: Part of what makes their shows difficult for me is the legions of fan-boys in the crowd who feel it necessary to "sing" along all of the "lyrics" with Craig. If you can't envision how ridiculous this is, imagine attending a speech given by Noam Chomsky, and then imagine 200 frat-boys in backwards hats yelling along with Chomsky word for word:
"The consistent anarchist, then, should be a socialist, but a socialist of a particular sort. He will not only oppose alienated and specialized labor and look forward to the appropriation of capital by the whole body of workers, but he will also insist that this appropriation be direct, not exercised by some elite force acting in the name of the proletariat." (via WikiQuote.
While not quite this, um, political, Craig's lyrics can be just as dense at times, and the idea of "singing" along to them is just absurd. Yet people do it.]

Art Brut: A not-as-talented band with a frontman (Eddie Argos) whose "lyrics" are sometimes funny, not particularly intelligent, and not even moving accidentally. Argos "sings" in the same way Craig Finn sings -- by talking loudly and occasionally slurring words together. While there's no denying Argos' skill as a frontman or his ability to write a clever, funny song, that's really about all there is to Art Brut. The shtick wears off with Art Brut about 2 songs in.

The 1990's: The 1990's shtick isn't that they have a clever frontman who speak-sings their lyrics. No, their shtick is apparently that they suck. And that they copped the guitar part for one of their biggest hits from the theme to The Cannonball Run. They seemed like nice enough chaps on stage, but their music was essentially warmed over Arctic Monkeys, which is itself warmed over Franz Ferdinand, which is itself garbage.

So, yeah, I wasn't real thrilled with tonight's show.

In fact, I left about 30 minutes into the Hold Steady's set. Not because their set was bad (it was OK), but because someone at the 9:30 Club decided that it would be a good idea to RIDICULOUSLY OVERSELL the show. I had a pretty good spot near about 10 feet from the stage, but as the Hold Steady's set started, it literally got so tight that I was having a hard time breathing. So I tried moving back, but the entire floor was so crowded that the only spot I found was a small gap in the far back corner of the room (where it was impossible to see the stage). So after trying without success to find a better spot upstairs, I left. It simply wasn't worth my time any more.

5 Comments:

At 8:37 AM, Blogger Pat said...

Steve, it might not be a good idea to go to shows that you don't particularly like the bands. Art Brut and The Hold Steady happen to be two of the best live bands in the business right now, and when they hit New York tonight I will be front and center having a blast!

 
At 9:40 AM, Blogger Steve said...

Pat-

To be fair, I do consider myself to be a pretty big Hold Steady fan (I have Tad as a permanent part of my header, I had Boys and Girls in America as my #1 album of 2006 (a bit high in retrospect, but still excellent), and their show at Irving last year was one of the best I've seen in recent years).

That said, I had two problems with their show last night. First, as I mentioned, it was hard to see/hear/enjoy it due to the crowding issues (and the chanting fans) that I mentioned.

Second, and perhaps this is a bigger, unspoken issue in my post, but it seems more and more to me that bands simply don't bring their "A Game" to D.C. I suppose I don't blame them -- the road is long, they're a night or two in either direction from the biggest night of their tour (NYC), and DC is, well, DC. But I've just gotten the feeling at a number of shows since I've been here that the shows I'm seeing from bands (not all, but some) just aren't as good as the shows they do in New York.

I definitely got that impression with the Hold Steady last night. And given how utterly fantastic their Irving show was last year, it was bound to be a disappointment for me.

As for Art Brut, again, I don't DIS-like them. I actually made a point to get to the show in time to see them (my first time). However I just didn't walk away thinking they were a great band. They're fine. Eddie is fun and funny and a great frontman. But the whole set seemed too scripted (and, based on the overhead projector, seems to have been entirely scripted), and therefore never really felt like a true "rock and roll" show to me.

And as for the 1990's... well, I've said enough about them.

PS: I see that it's your birthday. Have a good one! Sounds like a great show...

 
At 11:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree 100%. Have been a huge HS fan since day one, but hadn't seen them since Separation Sunday was released. I saw the show in Philly a few weeks ago and was alarmed to see how so many things I had liked about the band that had turned into a shtick. That's what happens when you tour over and over on the same album. I know that live shows are where bands like HS make their money, but there's something to be said for taking a break and recharging your batteries. Stuff that was the fun and cool the first time around can seem awfully rehearsed and dull the 100th time.

 
At 2:42 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

wow, I am sorry but whoever wrote this blog is an absolute moron (This is my opinion). When you say things like these...

If you can't envision how ridiculous this is, imagine attending a speech given by Noam Chomsky, and then imagine 200 frat-boys in backwards hats yelling along with Chomsky word for word:

"The consistent anarchist, then, should be a socialist, but a socialist of a particular sort. He will not only oppose alienated and specialized labor and look forward to the appropriation of capital by the whole body of workers, but he will also insist that this appropriation be direct, not exercised by some elite force acting in the name of the proletariat."

...you succeed at showing such an ignorance to a sense where I hope whoever is reading will never come back to this blog. Frat Kids with backwards hats? Did you see a single one last night? Noam Chomsky? Haha...these are the type of blogs that I wish Pitchfork, and others (including BrooklynVegan), would just read and laugh.

 
At 2:48 PM, Blogger Steve said...

Did I see a single person in a backwards hat last night? Why, yes I did. Thanks for asking.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home